Interaction in Social Networks (2024)

1. Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., & Drigotas, S. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1042–1057.
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1042
2. Bearman, P. S., Moody, J., & Stovel, K. (2004). Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 44–91.
   https://doi.org/10.1086/386272
3. Bell, R. A. (1991). Gender, friendship, network density, and loneliness. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(1), 45–56.
4. Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122–144). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwood.
5. Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54(4), 260–266.
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.4.260
6. Blieszner, R., & Adams, R. G. (1992). Adult friendship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483325675
7. Brown, G. W., & Harris, T. (1978). Social origins of depression: A study of psychiatric disorder in women. New York: Free Press.
8. Bryant, C. M., & Conger, R. D. (1999). Marital success and domains of social support in long-term relationships: Does the influence of network members ever end? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(2), 437–450.
   https://doi.org/10.2307/353760
9. Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79–141.
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.000455
10. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029095
11. Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 31–56). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
12. Cacioppo, J. T., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2009). Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 977–991.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016076
13. Caren, N. (2012). Two degrees of Tina Fettner. Blog post accessed on the web at http://nealcaren.web.unc.edu/two-degrees-of-tina-fetner/
14. Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance – A generalization of Heider theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277–293.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046049
15. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 370–379.
    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa066082
16. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. The New England Journal of Medicine, 358(21), 2249–2258.
    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0706154
17. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). Social contagion theory: Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Working paper accessed on the web at http://jhfowler.ucsd.edu/examining_dynamic_social_networks.pdf
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5408
18. Cohen-Cole, E., & Fletcher, J. (2008). Detecting implausible social network effects in acne, height, and headaches: Longitudinal analysis. British Medical Journal, 337(a2533), 1–5.
19. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Cotton, S., Cunningham, J. D., & Antill, J. K. (1993). Network structure, network support and the marital satisfaction of husbands and wives. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 176–181.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539308259136
21. Davis, J. A., & Leinhart, S. (1972). The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In J. Berger (Ed.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 218–251). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22. Davis, O. L. (1967). Building skills for social study in middle grades. Social Education, 31(3), 224–238.
23. Dijkstra, J., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., Steglich, C., Isaacs, J., Card, N., et al. (2010). Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: The roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology, 48(1), 187–220.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00183.x
24. Dodds, P. S., Muhamad, R., & Watts, D. J. (2003). An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science, 301(5634), 827–829.
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1081058
25. Doreian, P., & Krackhardt, D. (2001). Pre-transitive balance mechanisms for signed networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(1), 43–67.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990244
26. Doroud, M., Bhattacharyya, P., Wu, S.F., & Felmlee, D. (2011, October). The evolution of ego-centric triads: A microscopic approach toward predicting macroscopic network properties. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international conference on social computing, Boston.
    https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.101
27. Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love – Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(1), 1–18.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033373
28. Duck, S. W. (1982). A topography of relationship disengagement and dissolution. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships 4: Dissolving personal relationships. London/New York: Academic.
29. Eagle, N., Pentland, A., & Lazer, D. (2009). Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15274–15278.
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900282106
30. Emerson, R. M. (1981). Social exchange theory. In M. Rosenberg & R. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 30–65). New York: Academic.
31. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
32. Ennett, S., & Bauman, K. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 653–663.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.653
33. Faris, R. (2012). Aggression, exclusivity, and status attainment in interpersonal networks. Social Forces, 90(4), 1207–1235.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos074
34. Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011a). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 48–73.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410396196
35. Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011b). Social networks and aggression at the Wheatley school. CNN Report. http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/images/10/10/findings.from.the.wheatley.school.pdf
36. Faust, K. (1997). Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks, 19(2), 157–191.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00300-0
37. Feld, S. L. (1991). Why your friends have more friends than you do. The American Journal of Sociology, 96(6), 1464–1477.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229693
38. Feld, S. L., & Carter, W. C. (1998). When desegregation reduces interracial contact: A class size paradox for weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1165–1186.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/231350
39. Feld, S. L., & Elmore, R. (1982). Patterns of sociometric choices: Transitivity reconsidered. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(2), 77–85.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3033928
40. Felmlee, D. H. (2001). No couple is an island: A social network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces, 79(4), 1259–1287.
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0039
41. Felmlee, D. H. (2003). Interaction in social networks. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 389–409). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
42. Felmlee, D. H., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Close relationships and social psychology: Intersections and future paths. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 365–376.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2695846
43. Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53(1), 13–30.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786866
44. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45. Fischer, C. S. (2009). The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact? American Sociological Review, 74(4), 657–669.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400408
46. Fleischer, M. (2005). Fieldwork research and social network analysis: Different methods creating complementary perspectives. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(2), 120–134.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986204273436
47. Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2007). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370–379.
    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa066082
48. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
49. Freeman, L. C. (1992). Filling in the blanks – A theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 118–127.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786941
50. Friedkin, N. E. (1998). A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527524
51. Friedkin, N. E. (1999). Choice shift and group polarization. American Sociological Review, 64(6), 856–875.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2657407
52. Gartner, S. S. (2008). Ties to the dead: Connections to Iraq war and 9/11 casualties and presidential approval. American Sociological Review, 73(4), 690–695.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300408
53. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
54. Haas, S. A., Schaefer, D. R., & Kornienko, O. (2010). Health and the structure of adolescent social networks. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(4), 424–439.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510386791
55. Hallinan, M. T. (1974). A structural model of sentiment relations. The American Journal of Sociology, 80(2), 364–378.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/225804
56. Harris, K., & Udry, R. (1994). National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), 1994-2008. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 07 May 2012. DOI:10.3886/ICPSR33443.v2
    https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33443.v2
57. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
58. Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1970). Method for detecting structure in sociometric data. The American Journal of Sociology, 76(3), 492–513.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/224954
59. House, J. D. (1977). Social-organization of multinational-corporations – Canadian subsidiaries in oil industry. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology-Revue Canadienne De Sociologie Et D Anthropologie, 14(1), 1–14.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1977.tb00326.x
60. House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293–318.
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001453
61. Huston, T. L., & Burgess, R. L. (1979). The analysis of social exchange in developing relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 3–28). New York: Academic.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-143550-9.50007-0
62. Kadushin, C. (2002). The motivational foundation of social networks. Social Networks, 24(1), 77–91.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00052-1
63. Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., & Contractor, N. (2004). Network theory and small groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 307–332.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496404264941
64. Kerckhoff, A. C. (1974). Stratification process and outcomes in England and US. American Sociological Review, 39(6), 789–801.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2094153
65. Kessler, R. C., & McLeod, J. D. (1985). Social support and mental health in community samples. In S. Cohen & L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 219–240). New York: Academic.
66. Koku, E., Nazer, N., & Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1752–1774.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121958023
67. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 216–239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
68. Krackhardt, D., & Kilduff, M. (1999). Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 770–782.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.770
69. Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises – An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123–140.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786835
70. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox – A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
71. Kreager, D. A., & Haynie, D. L. (2011). Dangerous liaisons? Dating and drinking diffusion in adolescent peer networks. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 737–763.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411416934
72. Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(2), 143–164.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200205
73. Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). New York: Van Nostrand.
74. Lazer, D., Mergel, I., & Friedman, A. (2009). Co-citation of prominent social network articles in sociology journals: The evolving canon. Connections, 29(1), 43–64.
75. Lewis, K., Gonzalez, M., & Kaufman, J. (2012). Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(1), 68–72.
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109739109
76. Lewis, R. A. (1973). Social reaction and formation of dyads – Interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 36(3), 409–418.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786342
77. Markovsky, B., Willer, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 53, 220–236.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2095689
78. Marsden, P. (2003). Interviewer effects in measuring network size using a single name generator. Social Networks, 25(1), 1–16.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00009-6
79. Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63, 482–501.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2579058
80. Marsiglio, W., & Scanzoni, J. (1995). Families and friendships. New York: HarperCollins.
81. Martin, J. L. (2009). Formation and stabilization of vertical hierarchies among adolescents: Toward a quantitative ethology of dominance among humans. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(3), 241–264.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200307
82. Martin, J. L., & Fuller, S. (2004). Gendered power dynamics in intentional communities. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(4), 369–384.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250406700403
83. McFarland, D., & Pals, H. (2005). Motives and contexts of identity change: A case for network effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(4), 289–315.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800401
84. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 57–75.
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6
85. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100301
86. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2009). Models and marginals: Using survey evidence to study social networks. American Sociological Review, 74(4), 670–681.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400409
87. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
88. Milardo, R. M. (1987). Changes in social networks of women and men following divorce – A review. Journal of Family Issues, 8(1), 78–96.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019251387008001004
89. Milardo, R. M., & Allan, G. (1996). Social networks and marital relationships. In S. Duck, K. Dindia, W. Ickes, R. Milardo, R. Mills, & B. Saranson (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 505–522). London: Wiley.
90. Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 1(1), 61–67.
91. Moody, J. (2001). Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. The American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 679–716.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/338954
92. Moody, J., Brynildsen, W. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., & Gest, S. (2011). Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Social Networks, 33(2), 101–112.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.10.001
93. Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelationships. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10648-000
94. Mouw, T., & Entwisle, B. (2006). Residential segregation and interracial friendship in schools. The American Journal of Sociology, 112, 394–441.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/506415
95. Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/13156-000
96. Nie, N., & Erbing, L. (2000). Study offers early look at how internet is changing daily life. Stanford, CA: Institute for the Quantitative Study of Social Science.
97. Noel, H., & Nyhan, B. (2011). The “unfriending” problem: The consequences of homophily in friendship retention for causal estimates of social influence. Social Networks, 33(3), 211–218.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.003
98. Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J., & Hunter, A. G. (1999). Black couples, white couples: The early years of marriage. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Coping with divorce, single-parenting, and remarriage (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
99. Pachucki, M. A., & Breiger, R. A. (2010). Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 205–224.
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102615
100. Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal relationships and personal networks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
101. Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Communication- networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 10(1), 55–79.
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00004.x
102. Parks, M. R., & Eggert, L. L. (1991). The role of social context in the dynamics of personal relationships. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 2, pp. 1–34). London: Jessica Kingsley.
103. Parks, M. R., Stan, C. M., & Eggert, L. L. (1983). Romantic involvement and social network involvement. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(2), 116–131.
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3033848
104. Pattison, P., & Robins, G. (2002). Neighbourhood-based models for social networks. In R. Stolzenberg (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 301–337). Boston: Blackwell.
105. Pescoscolido, B. A. (1992). Beyond rational choice – The social dynamics of how people seek help. The American Journal of Sociology, 97(4), 1096–1138.
     https://doi.org/10.1086/229863
106. Pescoscolido, B. A. (2006). Of pride and prejudice: The role of sociology and social networks in integrating the health sciences. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(3), 189–208.
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650604700301
107. Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 187–224.
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187
108. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
109. Rands, M. (1988). Changes in social networks following marital separation and divorce. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Families and social networks (pp. 127–146). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
110. Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 91–115.
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
111. Rodkin, P. C., & Berger, C. (2008). Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(6), 473–485.
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025408093667
112. Schaefer, D., Kornienko, O., & Fox, A. (2011). Misery does not love company: Network selection mechanisms and depression homophily. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 764–785.
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411420813
113. Schnettler, J. (2009). A small world on feet of clay: A comparison of empirical small-world studies against best practice criteria. Social Networks, 31(3), 179–189.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.12.005
114. Sinclair, H. C., Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Wright, B. L. (2012, July). Is it really about defiance? Reactance and the Romeo & Juliet effect. Paper presented at the International Association for Relationship Research, Chicago.
115. Smith, K. P., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 405–429.
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134601
116. Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
117. Spanier, G. B., & Thompson, L. (1984). Parting: The aftermath of separation and divorce. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
118. Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships – A 3-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(4), 888–900.
     https://doi.org/10.2307/353170
119. Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Romantic partners’ perceptions of social network attributes with the passage of time and relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7(4), 325–340.
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00020.x
120. Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willetts, M. C. (2002). Social networks and change in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti, H. T. Reis, & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 257–284). New York: Cambridge University Press.
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499876.015
121. Stack, C. B. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for surviving in a black community. New York: Harper & Row.
122. Taylor, R. J., Chatters, L. M., & Jackson, J. S. (1993). A profile of familial relations among 3-generation black-families. Family Relations, 42(3), 332–341.
     https://doi.org/10.2307/585563
123. Thornes, B., & Collard, J. (1979). Who divorces? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
124. Timmer, S. G., Veroff, J., & Hatchett, S. (1996). Family ties and marital happiness: The different marital experiences of black and white newlywed couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(3), 335–359.
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596133003
125. VanderWeele, T. J. (2011). Sensitivity analysis for contagion effects in social networks. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 240–255.
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124111404821
126. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., et al. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78(6), 1843–1854.
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01102.x
127. Veroff, J., Douvan, E., & Hatchett, S. J. (1995). Marital instability: A social and behavioral study of the early years. Westport, CT: Praeger.
128. Walker, M. E., Wasserman, S., & Wellman, B. (1993). Statistical models for social support networks. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 71–78.
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124193022001004
129. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
130. Weiss, R. S. (1975). Marital separation. New York: Basic Books.
131. Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
132. Wellman, B. (2001). The rise of networked individualism. In L. Keeble (Ed.), Community networks online (pp. 227–252). London: Taylor & Francis.
133. Wellman, B., & Hampton, K. (1999). Living networked on and offline. Contemporary Sociology – A Journal of Reviews, 28(6), 648–654.
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2655535
134. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213–238.
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.213
135. Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks – Community ties and social support. The American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558–588.
     https://doi.org/10.1086/229572
136. Wimmer, A., & Lewis, K. (2010). Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. The American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 583–642.
     https://doi.org/10.1086/653658
137. Zimmerman, D. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9–23.
     https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687677
138. Zuckerman, E. W., & Jost, J. T. (2001). What makes you think you’re so popular? Self evaluation maintenance and the subjective side of the “friendship paradox”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(3), 207–223.
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3090112

The Evolution of Youth Friendship Networks from 6th to 12th Grade: School Transitions, Popularity and Centrality

Diane H. Felmlee, Cassie McMillan, Paulina Inara Rodis, D. Wayne Osgood

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_8

Social media as part of personal digital archives: exploring users’ practices and service providers’ policies regarding the preservation of digital memories

Beatrice Cannelli, Marta Musso

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-021-09379-8 ·

The peer effects of resident stock market participation: Evidence from 2019 CHFS

Zhijian Lin, Manyu Kong, Guoli Li, Xin Wang

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298894 ·

The Role of Occupational Socialness on the Productivity of Metropolitan Economies

Shade T. Shutters, Jose Lobo, Jieshu Wang

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4659919

Social Networks and COVID-19

Clayton D. Peoples, Kayla Furlano

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197615133.003.0019

Unveiling the Collective Behaviors of Large Language Model-Based Autonomous Agents in an Online Community: A Social Network Study

Huiru Chen, Zhenhua Wang, Ming Ren

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4895723

About this publication